Northern Pacific Railroad v. Tressler

North Dakota Supreme Court January 12, 1892

Northern Pacific Railroad v. Tressler, 2 N.D. 397 (N.D. 1892)

51 N.W. 787; 1892 N.D. LEXIS 27

Action, Any, Bartholomew, Been, Corliss, Counsel, Hearing, McConnell, Places, Request, Sixth, Third, Wallin, Winchester

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Winchester, J.

Following the case of Railroad Co. v. Barnes, ante (decided at this term), the judgment of the district court is reversed and a new trial ordered.

McConnell, J., concurs. Corliss, C. J., dissents. Bartholomew and Wallin, JJ., having been of counsel, did not sit on the hearing of the above-entitled action, nor take any part in the opinion; Judge Winchester, of the sixth judicial district, and Judge McConnell, of the third judicial district,' sitting by request in their places.

Reference

Full Case Name: Northern Pacific Railroad Company, and v. Daniel P. Tressler, County Treasurer of Mercer County, and
Status: Published