State v. King
State v. King
Opinion of the Court
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner was convicted in the District Court of Cass county at the February, 1899, term of an attempt to committ the crime of sodomy, and was sentenced to the state penitentiary for a period of five years. He urges, as ground for release from his confinement, an entire lack of legal authority, under the statute, to impose a penitentiary sentence for the crime of which he was convicted, or in fact to inflict any other than a jail sentence as a punishment therefor. This contention rests entirely upon the construction to be given to section 7694, Rev. Codes, relating to punishments for attempts, under which the petitioner was sentenced. The portions of this section which are important read as follows: “Every person who attempts to commit any crime, and in such attempt does any act toward the commission of such crime, but fails, or is prevented or intercepted in the perpetration thereof, is punishable, when no provision is made by law for the punishment of such attempt, as follows: (1) If the offense so attempted is punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary for four years or more, or by impi'isonment in the county jail, the person guilty of such attempt is punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary or in a county jail, as the case may be, for a term not exceeding one-half the longest term of imprisonment prescribed upon a conviction for the offense so attempted. (2) If the offense so attempted is punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary for any time less than four years, the person guilty of such attempt is punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than one year.” The punishment prescribed for the crime of sodomy is found in sectiorx 7x86, Id., which provides that it “is punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary not less than oxxe and not exceedixig ten years or in the county jail not more than one year.” The measure of punishmexit for an attempt to commit this crime, it is agreed, is given by one of the two subdivisions of section 7694, supra. The petitioner was sentenced under the first subdivision, whereas he contends that the penalty for the attempt of which he was coxivicted is governed by the second subdivision, and is, therefore, limited to a jail sentence. This contention is based upon the assertion that sodomy' is not punishable “for four years or more,” which plainly is a prerequisite to punishment under the first subdivision, but that it is punishable “for any time less thaxi four years,” which, it is claimed, brings it under
The petition is denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State of North Dakota v. Joseph King
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published