North Dakota Supreme Court, 1985

In re Disciplinary Action Against White

In re Disciplinary Action Against White
North Dakota Supreme Court · Decided December 19, 1985 · Erickstad, III, Levine, Meschke, Walle
378 N.W.2d 678; 1985 N.D. LEXIS 443 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

In re Disciplinary Action Against White

Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF SUSPENSION

Respondent attorney, James Evan White, filed an Affidavit pursuant to Rule 12, North Dakota Rules of Disciplinary Procedure wherein he acknowledged conduct in violation of certain provisions of the Code of Professional Responsibility and acknowledged that he could not successfully defend himself if the matters were prosecuted. The Respondent voluntarily consented to discipline requested by the Disciplinary Board in its complaint against him.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, that James Evan White be suspended from the practice of law commencing at 4 p.m., January 17, 1986, with the privilege to apply for reinstatement on or after June 17, 1986.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Mr. White comply with the provisions of Rule 14, North Dakota Rules of Disciplinary Procedure.

RALPH J. ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, Justice H.F. GIERKE III, Justice HERBERT L. MESCHKE, Justice BERYL J. LEVINE, Justice

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.