Syvertson v. Malaktaris

North Dakota Supreme Court
Syvertson v. Malaktaris, 2000 ND 211 (N.D. 2000)
622 N.W.2d 432; 2000 WL 33128181

Syvertson v. Malaktaris

Opinion

NOTE: SUMMARY OPINION, SEE NORTH DAKOTA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE, RULE 35.1 Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Charles E. Syvertson appeals from a judgment dismissing his complaint under Rule 12(b), N.D.R.Civ.P. This Court reviews an appeal from a Rule 12(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., dismissal in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, taking as true the allegations in the complaint. Burke v. North Dakota Dep't of Corrections andRehabilitation, 2000 ND 85, ¶ 4, 609 N.W.2d 729. Under Rule 35.1(a)(6), N.D.R.App.P., we summarily affirm the trial court's judgment.

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDEWALLE, C.J.

MARY MUEHLEN MARING

WILLIAM A. NEUMANN

CAROL RONNING KAPSNER

DAVID W. NELSON, D.J.

[¶ 3] The Honorable DAVID W. NELSON, D.J., sitting in place of SANDSTROM, J., disqualified.

Reference

Full Case Name
Charles E. Syvertson, and v. A.G. Malaktaris, Kathy Bachmeier, Mark Molesworth, Robert Coad, Tim Schuetzle, And
Cited By
6 cases
Status
Published