North Dakota Supreme Court, 2004

State v. Bates

State v. Bates
North Dakota Supreme Court · Decided December 14, 2004 · Vande Walle, Sandstrom, Neumann, Maring, Kapsner
2004 ND 222; 691 N.W.2d 193; 2004 N.D. LEXIS 365; 2004 WL 3104761

State v. Bates

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Jimmie Bates appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of gross sexual imposition. Bates argues there was insufficient evidence to convict him of the crime. Concluding there was sufficient evidence to uphold the guilty verdict, we summarily affirm the conviction under N.D.RApp.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, WILLIAM A. NEUMANN, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.