State v. Steen
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Steen v. State (N.D. 2007)
- Pfau v. Pfau (N.D. 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Randal Steen, Defendant and Appellant.
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Randal R. Steen, pro se, North Dakota State Penitentiary, P.O. Box 5521, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5521; submitted on brief.
Cynthia M. Feland, Assistant State's Attorney, 514 E. Thayer, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4413; submitted on brief.
Per Curiam.
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Randal Steen appeals from a trial court's order denying his motion for a new trial. Steen argues the trial court should have granted him a new trial because he is actually innocent of the charges for which he was convicted. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Steen's motion for a new trial. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.