Interest of T.A.G.
Interest of T.A.G.
Opinion
Filed 10/29/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
In the Interest of T.A.G.
Julie Lawyer, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
T.A.G., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20140445
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Gail Hagerty, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Pamela A. Nesvig, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for petitioner and appellee.
James D. Sandsmark, 921 Second Avenue South, Fargo, ND 58103, for respondent and appellant.
Interest of T.A.G.
No. 20140445
Per Curiam.
[¶1] T.A.G. appealed from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual. T.A.G. argues the district court erred in finding clear and convincing evidence supporting his continued commitment. We conclude the district court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Daniel J. Crothers
[¶3] The Honorable John T. Paulson, S.J., sitting in place of Sandstrom, J., disqualified.
Reference
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published