Nesheim v. Nesheim
Nesheim v. Nesheim
Opinion
Filed 12/20/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2016 ND 244
Christine M. Nesheim, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Eric Nesheim, Defendant
No. 20160159
Appeal from the District Court of Traill County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas R. Olson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Christine M. Nesheim, 718 5th Avenue Southeast, Mayville, N.D. 58257, plaintiff and appellant; submitted on brief.
Eric Nesheim, defendant; no appearance.
Nesheim v. Nesheim
No. 20160159
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Christine Nesheim appeals from a district court order denying her post-
judgment motion to amend findings of fact. On appeal she argues, among other things, that the district court erred in its division of the parties’ property, debts and mineral interests; the court erred in failing to award temporary spousal and child support back to February 2015; the court erred in dividing Eric Nesheim’s business property and debts; and the court incorrectly named the pension fund for purposes of a qualified domestic relations order. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published