Buresh v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court
Buresh v. State, 2017 ND 114 (N.D. 2017)
895 N.W.2d 313; 2017 N.D. LEXIS 118; 2017 WL 2119466
Carol, Crothers, Daniel, Fair, Gerald, Jerod, Kapsner, Lisa, McEvers, Per Curiam, Ronning, Tufte, VandeWalle

Buresh v. State

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Paul Buresh appeals a distinct court’s order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Buresh argues he was entitled to post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel prior to entering his guilty plea. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in dismissing Buresh’s application for post-conviction relief.

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Carol Ronning Kapsner

Reference

Full Case Name
Paul Elliot BURESH, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
Status
Published