State v. Raphael

North Dakota Supreme Court June 7, 2017

State v. Raphael, 2017 ND 131 (N.D. 2017)

895 N.W.2d 314; 2017 N.D. LEXIS 143; 2017 WL 2461923

Vandewalle, Tufte, Crothers, McEvers, Kapsner

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Roxanne Raphael appeals a district court judgment after a jury convicted her of possession of a controlled substance. Raphael argues the jury’s verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude sufficient evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner

Reference

Full Case Name: STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Roxanne Racquel RAPHAEL, Defendant and Appellant
Status: Published