Jasmann v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court
Jasmann v. State, 2017 ND 150 (N.D. 2017)
897 N.W.2d 326; 2017 WL 2807362; 2017 N.D. LEXIS 153
Vandewalle, Tufte, Crothers, McEvers, Kapsner

Jasmann v. State

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Matthew Jasmann appealed from the district court’s order denying his application for post-conviction relief. In his application, Jasmann argued: (1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel, (2) the State failed to obtain evidence which was exculpatory in nature, and (3) the State’s actions during trial amounted to prosecu-torial misconduct. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P 35.1(a)(2), (7). State v. Steffes, 500 N.W.2d 608, 612 (N.D. 1993) (“Police generally have no duty to collect evidence for the defense.”).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner

Reference

Full Case Name
Matthew JASMANN, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
Status
Published