State v. De La Cruz

North Dakota Supreme Court
State v. De La Cruz, 2017 ND 276 (N.D. 2017)
904 N.W.2d 478
Vandewalle, Jensen, Tufte, Crothers, McEvers

State v. De La Cruz

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Miguel Ángel Rodriguez. De La Cruz appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of patronizing a minor for commercial sexual activity. On appeal,- De La Cruz argues the guilty verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude the State presented sufficient evidence and summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App,P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Jon J. Jensen Jérod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Miguel Angel Rodriguez DE LA CRUZ, Defendant and Appellant
Status
Published