State v. Palacio
North Dakota Supreme Court
State v. Palacio, 904 N.W.2d 41 (N.D. 2017)
2017 ND 273
Crothers, Jensen, McEvers, Tufte, Vandewalle
State v. Palacio
Opinion of the Court
[¶ 1] Juan Manuel Palacio III appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of drug paraphernalia and criminal conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. Palacio argues the state presented insufficient evidence to uphold the jury’s verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). State v. Gray, 2017 ND 108, ¶¶ 15-16, 893 N.W.2d 484 (affirming judgment where appellant failed to provide a trial transcript on appeal, making it “impossible for this Court to conduct a meaningful and intelligent review” whether the defendant preserved for appeal the issue of insufficiency of the evidence or whether sufficient evidence supported the verdict).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- STATE of North Dakota, and v. Juan Manuel PALACIO, III, and
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published