State v. Parks
State v. Parks
Opinion
[¶1] Scott Parks appealed after conditionally pleading guilty to charges of possession of a controlled substance and drug paraphernalia, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Parks argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a purported illegal stop of his vehicle, contending the stop was not supported by reasonable and articulable suspicion. We summarily affirm the amended criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).
See
City of West Fargo v. Ross
,
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.