State v. Schlieve

North Dakota Supreme Court
State v. Schlieve, 2018 ND 230 (N.D. 2018)
918 N.W.2d 386
Per Curiam

State v. Schlieve

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*387 [¶1] Dana Schlieve appealed a district court judgment revoking his probation and sentencing him to five years imprisonment. Schlieve argues the district court erred by not explicitly referencing which sentencing factors under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-04 were considered. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). State v. Gonzalez , 2011 ND 143 , ¶ 8, 799 N.W.2d 402 (a trial court need not explicitly reference the factors listed under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-04 and the factors do not constitute an exclusive list of all a trial court may consider in fixing a criminal sentence).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Zane Anderson, S.J.

[¶3] The Honorable Zane Anderson, S. J., sitting in place of Jensen, J., disqualified.

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Dana Scott SCHLIEVE, Defendant and Appellant
Status
Published