State v. Mejia

North Dakota Supreme Court
State v. Mejia, 2018 ND 249 (N.D. 2018)
919 N.W.2d 914
Per Curiam

State v. Mejia

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Joel Mejia appeals from a criminal judgment entered after he was found guilty of simple assault following a bench trial. Mejia argues there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction for simple assault and that the district court was required to make a finding on his claim of self-defense. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), concluding there was sufficient evidence to support the guilty verdict. We also affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7), concluding in a case tried without a jury, the court need only find the defendant guilty or not guilty. State v. Berger , 235 N.W.2d 254 , 263 (N.D. 1975).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Joel MEJIA, Defendant and Appellant
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published