Interest of D.V.A.
Interest of D.V.A.
Opinion
Filed 12/6/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
In the Interest of D.V.A. ---------- Julie Lawyer, Assistant State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee
v.
D.V.A., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20180166
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ryan A. Keefe (on brief), Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellee.
Kent M. Morrow (on brief), Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellant. Interest of D.V.A. No. 20180166
Per Curiam. [¶1] D.V.A. appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from treatment and finding he remains a sexually dangerous individual. D.V.A. argues the district court erred in denying his application for discharge because the order is not supported by sufficient evidence that he would likely engage in further acts of sexually predatory conduct placing others in danger under N.D.C.C. § 25-03.3-01(9). The district court’s findings of fact and order are supported by clear and convincing evidence, and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen Jerod E. Tufte
1
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- A district court order denying discharge from civil commitment as a sexually dangerous individual is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).