State v. Johnson

North Dakota Supreme Court
State v. Johnson, 2019 ND 91 (N.D. 2019)
925 N.W.2d 396
Per Curiam

State v. Johnson

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Lucas Michael Johnson appeals from a criminal judgment entered after he conditionally pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a controlled substance and unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia. Johnson argues the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search unsupported by reasonable and articulable suspicion. We conclude there is sufficient competent evidence supporting the district court's finding of a traffic violation constituting reasonable and articulable suspicion for the stop. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). See State v. Asbach , 2015 ND 280 , ¶¶ 11-14, 871 N.W.2d 820 .

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Jon J. Jensen

Reference

Full Case Name
STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Lucas Michael JOHNSON, Defendant and Appellant
Status
Published
Syllabus
Criminal judgment finding defendant guilty of unlawful possession of a controlled substance in violation of N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23 and unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia in violation of N.D.C.C. § 19-03.4-03 is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).