Keller v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court
Keller v. State, 2019 ND 116 (N.D. 2019)
926 N.W.2d 705
Per Curiam

Keller v. State

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*706 [¶1] Thomas Jeames Keller appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Keller argues the district court erred in denying his application for post-conviction relief because Keller was prejudiced by ineffective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to obtain a pre-sentence investigation report prior to sentencing. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7) because Keller did not show there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial. See Booth v. State , 2017 ND 97 , ¶ 13, 893 N.W.2d 186 (a defendant who pleads guilty knowingly and voluntarily cannot show in what manner actual prejudice resulted from his trial counsel's failure to investigate more thoroughly).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

Reference

Full Case Name
Thomas Jeames KELLER, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
Status
Published
Syllabus
Summary affirmance of district court's denial of post-conviction relief.