Everett v. State
Everett v. State
Opinion
[¶1] Tilmer Everett appeals after the district court summarily dismissed his application for post-conviction relief.
[¶2] In 2007 a jury found Everett guilty of gross sexual imposition. This Court affirmed.
State v. Everett
,
[¶3] The district court allowed the current application for post-conviction relief based on a signed affidavit containing alleged new evidence. Upon review the district court summarily dismissed the application. On appeal Everett argues the district court erred when it allowed the State to file an untimely motion for summary disposition.
[¶4] We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), (6), and (7) ;
Klose v. State
,
[¶5] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Tilmer EVERETT, Petitioner and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- In post-conviction relief proceedings, it is not an abuse of discretion to deny default judgment when a petitioner cannot show he suffered any prejudice from the State's untimely response. A district court order summarily dismissing a post-conviction relief application is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), (6), and (7).