State v. Pittenger
State v. Pittenger
Opinion
Filed 10/29/2019 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Alexander Justin Pittenger, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20190050
Appeal from the District Court of McHenry County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable Michael Patrick Hurly, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam
Joshua E. Frey, State’s Attorney, Towner, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
William R. Hartl, Rugby, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Pittenger No. 20190050
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Alexander Pittenger appeals from a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of aggravated assault. Pittenger argues there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury verdict for his conviction. Pittenger also argues the district court abused its discretion when it permitted the State’s witness to testify about the extent of the victim’s injury. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude sufficient evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of conviction. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Jon J. Jensen
1
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- The criminal judgment entered after a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).