Interest of R.S.

North Dakota Supreme Court
Interest of R.S., 2020 ND 60 (N.D. 2020)
Per Curiam

Interest of R.S.

Opinion

Filed 03/19/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2020 ND 60

In the Interest of R.S.

William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee v. R.S., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20200045

Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Mark T. Blumer, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Leo A. Ryan, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief. Interest of R.S. No. 20200045

Per Curiam.

[¶1] R.S. appeals from the district court’s order granting the request for continuing treatment. R.S. argues that there lacked clear and convincing evidence to support he was mentally ill and required treatment as mandated by N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-02. We conclude the district court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We affirm under N.D.R.App.35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte

1

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
A district court's order granting the request for continuing treatment is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.35.1(a)(2).