Rath v. Rath

North Dakota Supreme Court
Rath v. Rath, 2020 ND 96 (N.D. 2020)
Per Curiam

Rath v. Rath

Opinion

Filed 5/7/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2020 ND 96

Kayla Jones, Plaintiff v. Mark Rath, Defendant and Appellant and State of North Dakota, Statutory Real Party in Interest

No. 20190330

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable John W. Grinsteiner, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Kayla Jones; no appearance.

Mark Rath, Bismarck, ND, defendant and appellant. Rath v. Rath No. 20190330

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Mark Rath appeals from orders denying his “motion for contempt” and request to reconsider. On appeal, Mark Rath argues the district court abused its discretion by not holding Kayla Rath in contempt. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). Mark Rath also made a multitude of additional arguments, including that he was denied due process. We summarily affirm the additional issues Mark Rath has raised under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte

1

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
Syllabus
District court orders denying a motion for contempt and a request to reconsider are affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1 (a)(1) and (4).