Rath v. Rath
Rath v. Rath
Opinion
Filed 5/7/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Kayla Jones, Plaintiff v. Mark Rath, Defendant and Appellant and State of North Dakota, Statutory Real Party in Interest
No. 20190330
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable John W. Grinsteiner, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Kayla Jones; no appearance.
Mark Rath, Bismarck, ND, defendant and appellant. Rath v. Rath No. 20190330
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Mark Rath appeals from orders denying his “motion for contempt” and request to reconsider. On appeal, Mark Rath argues the district court abused its discretion by not holding Kayla Rath in contempt. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). Mark Rath also made a multitude of additional arguments, including that he was denied due process. We summarily affirm the additional issues Mark Rath has raised under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte
1
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- District court orders denying a motion for contempt and a request to reconsider are affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1 (a)(1) and (4).