North Dakota Supreme Court, 2020

Rath v. Rath

Rath v. Rath
North Dakota Supreme Court · Decided May 7, 2020 · Per Curiam
2020 ND 96
Rath v. Rath

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Filed 5/7/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2020 ND 96

Kayla Jones, Plaintiff v.

Mark Rath, Defendant and Appellant and

State of North Dakota, Statutory Real Party in Interest

No. 20190330

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable John W. Grinsteiner, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Kayla Jones; no appearance.

Mark Rath, Bismarck, ND, defendant and appellant.

Rath v. Rath

No. 20190330

Per Curiam. [¶1] Mark Rath appeals from orders denying his “motion for contempt” and request to reconsider. On appeal, Mark Rath argues the district court abused its discretion by not holding Kayla Rath in contempt. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). Mark Rath also made a multitude of additional arguments, including that he was denied due process. We summarily affirm the additional issues Mark Rath has raised under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.