State v. Mooney
State v. Mooney
Opinion
Filed 06/02/2020 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Archie Allen Mooney, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20190333
Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Joshua B. Rustad, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Nathan K. Madden, Assistant State’s Attorney, Williston, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Mooney No. 20190333
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Archie Mooney appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of multiple drug related offenses. Mooney argues the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s guilty verdicts. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
1
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- A criminal judgment entered after a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).