State v. Mooney

North Dakota Supreme Court
State v. Mooney, 2020 ND 127 (N.D. 2020)
Per Curiam

State v. Mooney

Opinion

Filed 06/02/2020 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2020 ND 127

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Archie Allen Mooney, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20190333

Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Joshua B. Rustad, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Nathan K. Madden, Assistant State’s Attorney, Williston, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Mooney No. 20190333

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Archie Mooney appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of multiple drug related offenses. Mooney argues the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s guilty verdicts. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

1

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
Syllabus
A criminal judgment entered after a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).