State v. Stenbak
State v. Stenbak
Opinion
Filed 06/02/2020 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Clark Stenbak, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20190401
Appeal from the District Court of Mountrail County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Richard L. Hagar, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
Wade G. Enget, Mountrail County State’s Attorney, Stanley, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. State v. Stenbak No. 20190401
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Clark Stenbak appeals from a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of menacing and preventing arrest. Stenbak argues insufficient evidence was presented to sustain his convictions. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude sufficient evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of the convictions. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle
1
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- The criminal judgment entered after a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).