State v. Stenbak

North Dakota Supreme Court
State v. Stenbak, 2020 ND 122 (N.D. 2020)
Per Curiam

State v. Stenbak

Opinion

Filed 06/02/2020 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2020 ND 122

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Clark Stenbak, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20190401

Appeal from the District Court of Mountrail County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Richard L. Hagar, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

Wade G. Enget, Mountrail County State’s Attorney, Stanley, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. State v. Stenbak No. 20190401

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Clark Stenbak appeals from a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of menacing and preventing arrest. Stenbak argues insufficient evidence was presented to sustain his convictions. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude sufficient evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of the convictions. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle

1

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
Syllabus
The criminal judgment entered after a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).