State v. Kuntz

North Dakota Supreme Court
State v. Kuntz, 2020 ND 149 (N.D. 2020)
Per Curiam

State v. Kuntz

Opinion

Filed 06/29/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2020 ND 149

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Jody Lynn Kuntz, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20190365

Appeal from the District Court of Dunn County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Dann E. Greenwood, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Stephenie L. Davis, State’s Attorney, Manning, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Mark C. Sherer, Dickinson, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Kuntz No. 20190365

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Jody Lynn Kuntz appealed the district court’s order for restitution. Kuntz argued the district court abused its discretion in awarding restitution based upon speculation instead of reasonably certain information. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2] Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

1

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
Syllabus
A district court's order for restitution is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).