State v. Bethancorth

North Dakota Supreme Court
State v. Bethancorth, 945 N.W.2d 250 (N.D. 2020)
2020 ND 133
Per Curiam

State v. Bethancorth

Opinion

Filed 06/29/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2020 ND 133

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Francisco Eugenio Bethancorth, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20200020

Appeal from the District Court of Dickey County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Daniel D. Narum, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Mary E. Depuydt, Special Assistant State’s Attorney, Wishek, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant. State v. Bethancorth No. 20200020

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Francisco Eugenio Bethancorth appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of criminal trespass. He argues his degree of intoxication prevented him from knowing that he was not licensed or privileged to enter or remain in a dwelling or highly secured premises, and the district court erred by denying his motion for acquittal. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle

1

Reference

Status
Published
Syllabus
A criminal judgment for criminal trespass entered after a jury verdict is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).