North Dakota Supreme Court, 2020

Toure v. State

Toure v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court · Decided October 21, 2020 · Per Curiam
949 N.W.2d 861; 2020 ND 211 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Toure v. State

Opinion

Filed 10/21/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2020 ND 211 Omar Toure, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee No. 20200040 Appeal from the District Court of Williams County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable Benjamen J. Johnson, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Steven Balaban, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant.

Nathan K. Madden, Assistant State’s Attorney, Williston, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Toure v. State No. 20200040 Per Curiam. [¶1] Omar Toure appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Following a post-conviction hearing, the court found Toure failed to demonstrate any prejudice from the alleged errors of his trial counsel and therefore failed to satisfy the Strickland test for ineffective assistance of counsel. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The court did not clearly err in denying Toure’s application for post-conviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers Gerald W. VandeWalle Jerod E. Tufte Lisa Fair McEvers

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.