North Dakota Supreme Court, 2021

State v. Rennie

State v. Rennie
North Dakota Supreme Court · Decided April 14, 2021 · Per Curiam
958 N.W.2d 142; 2021 ND 66 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Rennie

Opinion

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT APRIL 14, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2021 ND 66

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Arnold Nudah Rennie, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20200307 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Thomas J. Schneider, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Julie A. Lawyer, Burleigh County State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Rennie No. 20200307 Per Curiam. [¶1] Arnold Rennie appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition and corruption of a minor. [¶2] On appeal, Rennie argues the district court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to dismiss based on alleged Rule 16, N.D.R.Crim.P., discovery violations by the State. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rennie’s motion to dismiss. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). [¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.