North Dakota Supreme Court, 2021

State v. Urrabazo

State v. Urrabazo
North Dakota Supreme Court · Decided October 14, 2021 · Per Curiam
965 N.W.2d 425; 2021 ND 179 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)
State v. Urrabazo

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OCTOBER 14, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2021 ND 179

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v.

Jaime Nmn Urrabazo, Defendant and Appellant No. 20210142

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Frank L. Racek, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Derek K. Steiner, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

State v. Urrabazo

No. 20210142

Per Curiam. [¶1] Jaime Urrabazo appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of delivery of a controlled substance, a class B felony. On appeal, Urrabazo argues the evidence presented against him at trial was insufficient to sustain the guilty verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.