North Dakota Supreme Court, 2021

State v. Reddog

State v. Reddog
North Dakota Supreme Court · Decided October 14, 2021 · Per Curiam
965 N.W.2d 432; 2021 ND 180 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Reddog

Opinion

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OCTOBER 14, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2021 ND 180 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Barry Ryder Reddog, Defendant and Appellant No. 20210055 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Julie A. Lawyer, State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plainitff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Reddog No. 20210055 Per Curiam. [¶1] Barry Reddog appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of robbery with a firearm, destructive device, or other dangerous weapon and conspiracy to commit felonious restraint. He argues the evidence presented at trial is insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. After reviewing the record, we conclude substantial evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.