State v. Jensen
State v. Jensen
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OCTOBER 28, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Randy Scott Jensen, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20210098
Appeal from the District Court of Barnes County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jay A. Schmitz, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Tonya Duffy, State’s Attorney, Valley City, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Scott O. Diamond, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Jensen No. 20210098
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Randy Scott Jensen appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon a conditional guilty plea to charges of unlawful possession of a controlled substance, unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia, and driving under suspension. Jensen argues the court erred in denying his motion to suppress because he did not give officers consent to search his vehicle. We conclude there was sufficient competent evidence capable of supporting the court’s finding that Jensen consented to the search of his vehicle. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
1
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- A criminal judgment entered following denial of a motion to suppress evidence is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).