State v. Olsen
State v. Olsen
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DECEMBER 23, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Thomas Lynn Olsen, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20210127
Appeal from the District Court of Griggs County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable James D. Hovey, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jayme J. Tenneson, State’s Attorney, Lakota, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant. State v. Olsen No. 20210127
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Thomas Olsen appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition. On appeal, Olsen argues the district court erred in denying his N.D.R.Crim.P. 29 motion regarding time as an essential element. He also argues the court’s preliminary ruling on probable cause pursuant to N.D.R.Crim.P. 4, 5, and 5.1 undermines the integrity of the judicial process. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7); State v. Montplaisir, 2015 ND 237, ¶ 16, 869 N.W.2d 435 (“A defendant who is found guilty at trial may not, on appeal, challenge the district court’s decision on probable cause at the preliminary hearing.”).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
1
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- A criminal judgment entered after a jury found the defendant guilty of gross sexual imposition is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7).