North Dakota Supreme Court, 2021

State v. Olsen

State v. Olsen
North Dakota Supreme Court · Decided December 23, 2021 · Per Curiam
968 N.W.2d 182; 2021 ND 230 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

State v. Olsen

Opinion

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DECEMBER 23, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2021 ND 230 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Thomas Lynn Olsen, Defendant and Appellant No. 20210127 Appeal from the District Court of Griggs County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable James D. Hovey, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jayme J. Tenneson, State’s Attorney, Lakota, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.

Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Olsen No. 20210127 Per Curiam. [¶1] Thomas Olsen appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition. On appeal, Olsen argues the district court erred in denying his N.D.R.Crim.P. 29 motion regarding time as an essential element. He also argues the court’s preliminary ruling on probable cause pursuant to N.D.R.Crim.P. 4, 5, and 5.1 undermines the integrity of the judicial process. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (7); State v. Montplaisir, 2015 ND 237, ¶ 16, 869 N.W.2d 435 (“A defendant who is found guilty at trial may not, on appeal, challenge the district court’s decision on probable cause at the preliminary hearing.”). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.