Hehr v. Hehr
Hehr v. Hehr
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT DECEMBER 23, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Keith Hehr, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Mary Hehr, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20210176
Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Troy J. LeFevre, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Elisa A. Fischer (argued) and Theresa L. Kellington (on brief), Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Alex S. Kelsch, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant. Hehr v. Hehr No. 20210176
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Mary Hehr appeals the judgment entered by the district court in the parties’ divorce proceedings, arguing the district court erred in its distribution of marital property. The distribution of marital property by the district court is subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. See Willprecht v. Willprecht, 2020 ND 77, ¶ 19, 941 N.W.2d 556. We conclude the court’s distribution of property was not induced by an erroneous view of the law, there is evidence in the record to support the distribution, and, after a review of the entire record, we are not left with a definite and firm conviction a mistake has been made. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
1
Reference
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- A district court's distribution of marital property in a divorce proceeding is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).