Schultz v. DeClusin
Schultz v. DeClusin
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT APRIL 14, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2022 ND 75
Tiffany Schultz, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Zachary DeClusin, Defendant and Appellee
No. 20210315 Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Susan L. Bailey, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Theresa L. Kellington, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellant.
Leah R. Carlson, West Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellee.
Schultz v. DeClusin No. 20210315 Per Curiam. [¶1] Tiffany Schultz appeals from an amended judgment awarding primary residential responsibility of their child to Zachary DeClusin. She also appeals from a money judgment awarding DeClusin $17,159.63 in attorney’s fees and costs. Schultz claims the district court clearly erred in awarding DeClusin primary residential responsibility, and the court abused its discretion by awarding DeClusin attorney’s fees and costs. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.