North Dakota Supreme Court, 2022

Gaede v. State

Gaede v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court · Decided April 14, 2022 · Per Curiam
973 N.W.2d 5; 2022 ND 71 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Gaede v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT APRIL 14, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2022 ND 71

Dennis James Gaede, Petitioner and Appellant v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee No. 20210336

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven E. McCullough, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Birch P. Burdick, State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Gaede v. State

No. 20210336

Per Curiam. [¶1] Dennis James Gaede appeals from an order denying his petition for postconviction relief. Gaede claims his 2018 diagnosis for post-traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”) is newly discovered evidence. The district court found Gaede’s PTSD diagnosis is not newly discovered evidence, and this claim was brought outside the statute of limitations provided in N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1- 01(3)(b). We conclude the court did not clearly err in finding Gaede’s claim is outside the statute of limitations in denying Gaede’s petition for postconviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.