Gaede v. State
Gaede v. State
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT APRIL 14, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Dennis James Gaede, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20210336
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven E. McCullough, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Birch P. Burdick, State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief. Gaede v. State No. 20210336
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Dennis James Gaede appeals from an order denying his petition for postconviction relief. Gaede claims his 2018 diagnosis for post-traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”) is newly discovered evidence. The district court found Gaede’s PTSD diagnosis is not newly discovered evidence, and this claim was brought outside the statute of limitations provided in N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1- 01(3)(b). We conclude the court did not clearly err in finding Gaede’s claim is outside the statute of limitations in denying Gaede’s petition for postconviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
1
Reference
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- A district court order denying a petition for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).