Gaede v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court
Gaede v. State, 973 N.W.2d 5 (N.D. 2022)
2022 ND 71
Per Curiam

Gaede v. State

Opinion

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT APRIL 14, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2022 ND 71

Dennis James Gaede, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20210336

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven E. McCullough, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Birch P. Burdick, State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief. Gaede v. State No. 20210336

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Dennis James Gaede appeals from an order denying his petition for postconviction relief. Gaede claims his 2018 diagnosis for post-traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”) is newly discovered evidence. The district court found Gaede’s PTSD diagnosis is not newly discovered evidence, and this claim was brought outside the statute of limitations provided in N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1- 01(3)(b). We conclude the court did not clearly err in finding Gaede’s claim is outside the statute of limitations in denying Gaede’s petition for postconviction relief. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte

1

Reference

Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
Syllabus
A district court order denying a petition for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).