North Dakota Supreme Court, 2022

Matter of Shane Lance Yates

Matter of Shane Lance Yates
North Dakota Supreme Court · Decided May 12, 2022 · Per Curiam
974 N.W.2d 408; 2022 ND 103 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Matter of Shane Lance Yates

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MAY 12, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2022 ND 103

In the Matter of the Petition of Shane Lance Yates for Name Change No. 20220054

In the Matter of the Petition of Amy Jo Yates for Name Change No. 20220056

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Stephannie N. Stiel, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Shane L. Yates, self-represented, Fargo, ND, appellant.

Amy J. Yates, self-represented, Fargo, ND, appellant.

Matter of Shane Lance Yates

No. 20220054

Matter of Amy Jo Yates

No. 20220056

Per Curiam. [¶1] Shane Lance Yates and Amy Jo Yates (“Petitioners”) appeal district court orders denying their petitions for name changes and requests for evidentiary hearings. The Petitioners sought to change their names from “SHANE LANCE YATES” (in all uppercase letters) to “Shane Lance Yates” and “AMY JO YATES” (in all uppercase letters) to “Amy Jo Yates.” The Petitioners argue the court erred because they are exercising their private core civilian rights and that they should have been granted a private evidentiary hearing. We conclude the district court did not err in denying the petitions for name changes or requests for evidentiary hearings. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7); Matter of Yates, 2022 ND 11, ¶ 5, 969 N.W.2d 195 (holding there was no proper and reasonable cause for the district court to change two individuals’ names from all capital letters to initial capital letters followed by lowercase letters because such a request was not a change from one name to another); Matter of Mees, 465 N.W.2d 172, 173 (N.D. 1991) (“Section 32-28-02, N.D.C.C., does not require an evidentiary hearing in conjunction with a petition for change of name.”). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.