State v. Lockwood
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT SEPTEMBER 29, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2022 ND 175
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v.
Christopher Lockwood, Defendant and Appellant
Nos. 20220019, 20220020 and 20220021
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Daniel J. Borgen, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Joshua A. Amundson, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Christopher W. Lockwood, Bismarck, ND, self-represented, defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. Lockwood
Nos. 20220019, 20220020 & 20220021 Per Curiam. [¶1] Christopher Lockwood appeals from three amended criminal judgments revoking his probation and resentencing him. It is unclear what Lockwood argues on appeal because his brief does not contain the minimum requirements in N.D.R.App.P. 28. Under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8), this Court may summarily affirm a judgment if the appellant’s brief fails to comply with N.D.R.App.P. 28. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(8). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.