State v. Lane
State v. Lane
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT NOVEMBER 10, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Eldrey Marchone Lane, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20220164
Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Jay D. Knudson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ashlei A. Neufeld, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Lane No. 20220164
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Eldrey Marchone Lane appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of driving under suspension. Lane argues the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude sufficient evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of conviction. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
1
Reference
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published
- Syllabus
- When this Court views evidence admitted at trial in a light most favorable to a verdict, and finds sufficient evidence exists that would allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of conviction, a criminal judgment must be affirmed.