Interest of R.S.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT FEBRUARY 16, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2023 ND 21
In the Interest of R.S.
William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee v.
R.S., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20230010
Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Cherie L. Clark, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Leo A. Ryan, Special Assistant Attorney General, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.
Interest of R.S.
No. 20230010
Per Curiam. [¶1] R.S. appeals from the district court’s continuing treatment order. He argues the finding he is mentally ill and a person requiring continuing treatment is not supported by clear and convincing evidence. We review the district court’s findings under a more probing clearly erroneous standard. Interest of Doe, 2019 ND 23, ¶ 4, 921 N.W.2d 403. We conclude sufficient evidence existed for the district court to find R.S. is mentally ill and is a person requiring continuing treatment. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
Douglas A. Bahr
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.