Interest of D.H.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MARCH 31, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2023 ND 60
In the Interest of D.H.
Adam D. Miller, PsyD, Petitioner and Appellee v.
D.H., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20230057
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Reid A. Brady, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Derek K. Steiner, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.
Interest of D.H.
No. 20230057
Per Curiam. [¶1] D.H. appeals from the district court’s order continuing treatment. On appeal, D.H. argues the finding he is mentally ill and a person requiring treatment is not supported by clear and convincing evidence. In mental health commitment cases, we apply the more probing clearly erroneous standard of review. Interest of Doe, 2019 ND 23, ¶ 4, 921 N.W.2d 403. We conclude the district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
Douglas A. Bahr
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.