State v. Heinrich
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- State v. Freeman (N.D. 2024)
- Brown v. State (N.D. 2024)
- Brown v. State 2024 ND 95 (N.D. 2024)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MAY 30, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2023 ND 102
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v.
Jeremy Wayne Heinrich, Defendant and Appellant No. 20220339
Appeal from the District Court of Barnes County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jay A. Schmitz, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Tonya Duffy, State’s Attorney, Valley City, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. Heinrich
No. 20220339
Per Curiam. [¶1] Jeremy Wayne Heinrich appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of one count of continuous sexual abuse of a child and two counts of promoting obscenity to minors. He argues the convictions are not supported by sufficient evidence. “In reviewing challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, the defendant bears the burden of showing the evidence reveals no reasonable inference of guilt when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.” State v. Rai, 2019 ND 71, ¶ 13, 924 N.W.2d 410 (cleaned up). After reviewing the record, we conclude sufficient evidence exists for a jury to draw a reasonable inference Heinrich committed the charged offenses. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte
Douglas A. Bahr
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.