North Dakota Supreme Court, 2023

Interest of P.R.-K.

Interest of P.R.-K.
North Dakota Supreme Court · Decided September 28, 2023 · Per Curiam
2023 ND 184
Interest of P.R.-K.

Opinion

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT SEPTEMBER 28, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2023 ND 184

In the Interest of P.R.-K., minor child

State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v.

P.R.-K., child; P.R.-K., father; Respondents and

C.B., mother, Respondent and Appellant No. 20230281

In the Interest of K.R.-K., minor child

State of North Dakota, Petitioner and Appellee v.

K.R.-K., child; P.R.-K., father; Respondents and

C.B., mother, Respondent and Appellant No. 20230282

Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Kelly A. Dillon, Judicial Referee.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Rozanna C. Larson, State’s Attorney, Minot, ND, for petitioner and appellee.

Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant.

Interest of P.R.-K. and K.R.-K.

Nos. 20230281 & 20230282

Per Curiam. [¶1] C.B. appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating parental rights to her two minor children, P.R.-K. and K.R.-K. C.B. argues the court erred in finding conditions and causes of deprivation are likely to continue. C.B. also argues the court erred in finding the children will suffer physical, mental, moral or emotional harm without termination. The record supports the court’s findings by clear and convincing evidence that a child tested positive for THC and methamphetamine, and C.B. continued using methamphetamine, was homeless, lacked employment, and had suicidal tendencies. Those findings are not clearly erroneous. [¶2] The juvenile court found the children spent over 450 of the last 660 nights in the care, control, and custody of the human service zone and are in need of protection. The record supports the court’s findings, and they are not clearly erroneous. Based on the findings, the court did not abuse its discretion terminating C.B.’s parental rights. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (4). [¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte

Douglas A. Bahr

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.