North Dakota Supreme Court, 2024

Interest of R.K.

Interest of R.K.
North Dakota Supreme Court · Decided March 7, 2024 · Per Curiam
2024 ND 41
Interest of R.K.

Opinion

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MARCH 7, 2024 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2024 ND 41

In the Interest of R.K.

Adam D. Miller, PsyD, Petitioner and Appellee v.

R.K., Respondent and Appellant

No. 20240062

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Tristan J. Van de Streek, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jason Van Horn, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, N.D., for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

Andrew Marquart, Fargo, N.D., for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

Interest of R.K.

No. 20240062

Per Curiam. [¶1] R.K. appeals from a district court’s order continuing his treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital for a period not to exceed one year. On appeal, R.K. argues the district court erred by finding clear and convincing evidence that he is mentally ill and a person requiring treatment. In mental health commitment cases we review a district court’s factual findings under the clearly erroneous standard. In re Doe, 2019 ND 23, ¶ 4, 921 N.W.2d 403. We conclude the district court did not clearly err in finding clear and convincing evidence that R.K. is mentally ill and a person requiring treatment. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte

Douglas A. Bahr

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.