Windyboy v. State
Windyboy v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2025 ND 15 Georgia Windyboy, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20240204 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Pamela A. Nesvig, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Tracy E. Reames, Fargo, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Julie A. Lawyer, State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Windyboy v. State No. 20240204 Per Curiam. [¶1] Georgia Windyboy appeals from a district court judgment denying her application for postconviction relief. In her application, Windyboy argued she received ineffective assistance of counsel because her trial counsel failed to advise her that the court could sentence her beyond the parties’ joint recommendation, making her plea not knowing and voluntary and warranting its withdrawal. After a hearing, the court denied Windyboy’s application, concluding she failed to establish her claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. [¶2] Findings of fact made in a postconviction relief proceeding are subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. Urrabazo v. State, 2024 ND 67, ¶ 6, 5 N.W.3d 521. After a review of the record, we conclude the district court’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and the court did not err in determining Windyboy failed to establish her ineffective assistance of counsel claim. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.