Sailors v. U.S. Marshals Services

IN TFHOER U TNHIET EDDIS STTRAITCETS O DFI SNTERBIRCAT SCKOAU RT THOMAS D. SAILORS, Plaintiff, 8:18CV189 vs. DANIEL KEYES, SPECIAL ORDER ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF PAUL KEYES, US Marshal #3483, MAXWELL HUBKA, City of Lincoln Police Ofc. #1655, and COLE JENNINGS, City of Lincoln Police Ofc. #1650, in their Individual Capacities, Defendants.

THOMAS D. SAILORS, 8:19CV01 Plaintiff, vs. ORDER U.S. MARSHALS SERVICES, and WILL IVERSON, Defendants.

This matter comes before the Court on its own motion. It appears to the Court that the above captioned cases are related. The Court has reviewed the filings in both cases and it appears the cases may be consolidated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a), as both cases arise out of the same set of facts and are based on similar, if not identical, allegations. See EEOC v. HBE Corp., 135 F.3d 543, 551 (8th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall have until June 21, 2019, to show cause why Sailors v. Keyes et al, 8:18CV189 (D. Neb. 2018) and Sailors v. U.S. Marshals Services et al, 8:19CV01 (D.

Neb. 2019) should not be consolidated for all purposes.

Dated this 5th day of June, 2019.

BY THE COURT: