United States District Court, Nebraska, 2020

Kaufman v. United States

Kaufman v. United States
United States District Court, Nebraska · Decided August 17, 2020
Kaufman v. United States

Trial Court Opinion

IN TFHOER U TNHIET EDDIS STTRAICTETS O DFI NSTERBIRCATS CKOAU RT RYAN KAUFMAN, Plaintiff, 8:18CV248 v. ORDER JO GRIFFITH, Defendant.

This matter is before the Court on a Findings and Recommendation (Filing No. 18) issued by the magistrate judge1 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). After a thorough review, the magistrate judge recommends the Court (1) permit the United States of America—over plaintiff Ryan Kaufman’s (“Kaufman”) objection—to substitute (Filing No. 8) for Jo Griffith as the named defendant in this case, see 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d), and (2) deny Kaufman’s Motion to Remand (Filing No. 10) this case to the District Court of Hall County, Nebraska. Kaufman has not objected to the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendation, and the time to object has now passed.

Under § 636(b)(1), the Court must “make a de novo review of . . . specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” Absent objection, however, further review is unnecessary. See Peretz v. United States, 501 U.S. 923, 939 (1991); Leonard v. Dorsey & Whitney LLP, 553 F.3d 609, 619-20 (8th Cir. 2009) (“[T]he failure to file objections eliminates not only the need for de novo review, but any review by the district court.”); see also Fed. R. Crim. P. 59 (a), (b)(2) (explaining the failure to timely object waives the right to review); NECrimR 59.2(a), (e).

Because Kaufman did not timely object to the magistrate judge’s sound findings and recommendation, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Findings and Recommendation (Filing No. 18) is accepted. Any objections are deemed waived.

2. The United States Attorney’s Notice of Substitution (Filing No. 8) and supporting Certification (Filing No. 8-1) are approved. The United States of America is substituted for Jo Griffith as the party defendant in this case. See 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(2).

3. Plaintiff Ryan Kaufman’s Motion to Remand (Filing No. 10) is denied in its entirety.

Dated this 17th day of August 2020.

BY THE COURT: Robert F. Rossiter, Jr. United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.