Cox v. Board of Parole

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA TRAVIS COX, Plaintiff, 8:23CV202 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BOARD OF PAROLE, OFFICE OF PAROLE SUPERVISION, OFFICE OF PAROLE ADMINISTRATION, NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES (NDCS), DANIELLE SANDERS, HEATHER TODD-ROBERSON, TOM VERPLANK, ROSALYN COTTON, LAYNE GISSLER, BOB TWISS, HABIB OLOMI, MARK LANGAN, DOUGLAS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, and MIKE MYERS, Defendants.

This matter is before two motions filed by Plaintiff on July 12, 2023, Filing No. 28; Filing No. 29, each of which will be addressed in turn.

I. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Plaintiff filed a motion asking the Court to grant a default judgment in Plaintiff’s favor “as no answer has been made since date of summons.” Filing No. 28. On June 8, 2023, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Summons,” Filing No. 19, which the Court construed as a motion, and denied on July 7, 2023, as the Court has not yet conducted the required initial review under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A. See Filing No. 26 at 7. As no summons have been issued or served on the defendants, Plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment is denied. ll. MOTION FOR DOCKET SHEET Plaintiff asks that the Court provide him with a free copy of the docket sheet because he is proceeding in forma pauperis and lacks funds to pay for a copy. Filing No. 29. The statutory right to proceed in forma pauperis does not include the right to receive copies of documents without payment. 28 U.S.C. § 1915; see also Guinn v. Heckler, 43 F.3d 1483 (10th Cir. 1994) (unpublished table decision) (“Plaintiff's principal error, however, is his apparent belief that an order granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis, without the payment of the ‘fees and costs’ referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), includes the right to have free copies of any documents in the record the indigent party desires. It does not....”); Haymes v. Smith, 73 F.R.D. 572, 574 (W.D.N.Y. 1976) (‘The generally recognized rule is that a court may not authorize the commitment of federal funds to underwrite the necessary expenditures of an indigent civil litigant’s action.”) (citing Tyler v. Lark, 472 F.2d 1077, 1078 (8th Cir. 1973)). If Plaintiff requires copies of court documents, he should contact the Clerk’s office to determine the proper method of requesting and paying for copies.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: Plaintiffs motion for default judgment, Filing No. 28, and motion for a copy of the docket sheet, Filing No. 29, are denied.

Dated this 18th day of July, 2023.

BY THE COURT: C4 FF Shit Joseph F. Bataillon Senior United States District Judge