State ex rel. Brown v. Bowers
State ex rel. Brown v. Bowers
Opinion of the Court
The relators allege in their petition that they are residents of certain territory adjacent to the city of Lincoln, which territory, although outside of the city limits, is included with the city of Lincoln in school district No. one of Lancaster county; that on the 24th day of January, 1880, the relators, being a majority of the legal voters of said adjacent territory, presented a petition to the respondent, who is the county superintendent of public instruction of said county, praying that said adjacent territory be detached from school district number one and attached to school district number one hundred and five, etc.; but that respondent refused to act upon said petition, or to attach said territory to said district number one hundred and five, etc. Wherefore, the relators pray for a writ of mandamus, etc.
Section 2 of the act provides that “ such schools shall be free to all children between the ages of five and twenty-one years, whose parents or guardians reside within the limits of said district, and to all children of non-residents paying taxes therein.” It is evident that the law does not restrict the boundaries of the district to the city limits, and the relators are within the boundaries of school district number one, and as it is not alleged that a majority of the voters in all the districts affected by the proposed change signed the petition addressed to the respondent, as required by section one of the act to establish a system of public instruction for the state of Nebraska
Writ denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- State of Nebraska, ex rel. Guy A. Brown, George E. Church, George K. Amory, and Allen W. Hawley v. H. S. Bowers, county superintendent of public instruction
- Status
- Published